Some remarks on arranging for the 20er
It has now been more than 5 years that I started arranging for crank organ. At the beginning,
I only arranged for 20er, but in the meantime, I have created many other arangements - for 26er and 31er,
the Triola Zither, various reed organs, etc. - in other words: for almost every sort of mechanical organ.
Still, most of arrangements are for the small 20er scale. Why? I don't really know ... but one reason
certainly is the challenge that comes with this limited scale.
It is a genuine harmonic puzzle: You have only a little
more than 2 octaves of b-flat and two natural e's. How
much harmonic variation can you do with that? It turns
out that you can vary quite much - the arrangement of
Jelly Roll Morton's Shreveport Stomp has modulations to 6
different keys!
My first arrangement was ... well, I threw it away. The eye-opener
(or is it "ear-opener"?) for me was the beginning of an
arrangement on Melvyn Wright's homepage (for a Busker organ; the
arrangement is still at www.melright.com/busker/harmonet.htm,
but when I heard it first, it sounded much brighter). When I
wrote it down, I found out four important things:
- I needed 4 staffs to write it down! 20 notes altogether -
and 4 staffs to write down an arrangement. Why is that
so? Simple: 20er arrangements (and all mechanical music)
are not limited by the "number of hands" - like
piano music - or even hands and legs - like (church)
organ music. Therefore a barrel organ must be handled
more like a (very) small orchestra: You invent voices without regarding
"physical limitation" (hands, legs), but only by
"function" or "purpose":
- melody
- bass
- accompaniment
These three are usually the minimum number of
necessary voices. Additional optional voices are:
- "ornament voice" (high trills or
rhythmic accompaniments mimicking percussion
effects)
- second melody
- countermelody
- ... and everything else that might be necessary
...
My standard template for arranging has 4 staffs, for
"ornament voice", melody, countermelody or
accompaniment, and bass. Depending on the density of the
arrangement, it is sometimes convenient to have two
staffs for melody and/or bass.
When writing arrangements, I usually start by putting
down melody and bass, followed by accompaniment. These
are then "fattened up" (with parallel thirds,
chords in the accompaniment, maybe a piece of "walking
bass" here or there). After that, I add ornaments to
the melody or as a separate voice. Finally, additional
voices are "squeezed in" if there is any space
left - which happens amazingly often! But ...
- ... the "music" that comes out of this process
often sounds quite dull when I play it the first time (listen
to the current version of "The Chrysanthemum"!).
The reason is that the "naked notes" are only
one half of an arrangement: The other half is musical
expression - for a small organ, this essentially
translates to "note length": Staccato or
legato, tiny breaks before or after notes, pulling an
ornament into a previous measure so that it starts a
little "early" - all this is necessary to make
the music "live" (and I am still at the
beginning of learning how to do that!). Some of the rules
are easy to find out:
- A syncope needs a staccato on the previous note
to stress it (listen to the ragtimes).
- Different voices usually should not "contradict"
each other: Where one voice uses staccato,
another should not dull the effect with a legato.
- If a motif occurs more often, it should always
use the same length distribution; or, in other
words: An arrangement should adhere to a "musical
standard". On and off, you can break this
rule - as I do in the arrangement for Haydn's Flötenuhr
Nr. 12.
There are probably many more wisdoms of this sort -
maybe I'll learn a few of them in the next decades ...
- 20er music, because it has so little possibilites of
variation, needs ornaments. Treatises for correct
ornamenting were written from the 1600s onwards, and
probably I should read one of these - because there are
so many possibilities, and so many possibilities to make
it wrong. The greatest sin is overdoing ornaments. I am
definitely guilty of that ... The second great sin is to
use "standard ornaments" - always the same
trill or the same run. In my opinion, only two of my
arrangements vary their ornaments sufficiently: The
Christmas song "Ihr Kinderlein, kommet" (where
I found out that retarding an ornament could heighten its
effect) and the "Entertainer". More to learn
...
- The last thing I learned from Melvyn Wright's arrangement
is that you can trick the ear. Listen to it: There is an
e-flat (if the arrangement is in b-flat) at the highest
end of the ornamental run in the introduction - even
though this e-flat is not present in the 20er scale! Our
ear extends the scale to its logical end by inventing
additional notes. Another trick is to remain on a wrong
bass note for a short time (if you do not have the right
note) - you will notice that "there was something",
but most people cannot pin down what happened - and then
its already gone (example in the introduction to "Weeping
Willow"). However, tricks of that sort work - as far
as I know - only in faster passages.
Ok - that is all my wisdom. Items 1. and 2. above are the most
important ones; they probably cannot be ignored by anyone
arranging music. For the rest (especially all the other important
aspects I ignored - e.g., there is nothing about rhythm here!),
wait until I learned about them. Maybe I'll extend this text a
little - so come back again!
P.S. Only after I wrote that, I saw that I did not give any
examples (written and/or sound). Maybe I find time for that
somewhen ...
Home Privacy policy
(c) 18.9.2004 H.M.Müller